There is a strange phenomenon I’ve noticed over the years: The moment you agree with one thing a person says, people assume you’ve signed up for everything they have ever believed.
Support one policy? Congratulations. Apparently you’re now responsible for every decision that party has ever taken. Question one action? Ah, so you’ve always hated them. We’ve made independent thinking look suspicious. Somewhere along the way, we stopped supporting ideas and started adopting identities. Why?
Why is it so difficult to say, “I agree with this, but I completely disagree with that”? Why does every opinion have to come as a package deal?
It is fascinating, really.
We have become so uncomfortable with complexity that we prefer certainty, even if it means borrowing someone else’s entire worldview. It is easier to pick a side than to think through every issue. Easier to wear a label than to carry a conscience.And perhaps that is the biggest crisis of our times; not political polarisation, but intellectual laziness.
Yesterday’s protests reminded me of this. Before people asked what happened, they asked who organised it. Before asking whether the response was proportionate, they wanted to know which political ideology stood behind the crowd. As though justice depends on the identity of the victim. As though pain first needs a background check.
Every movement has people with agendas. Every political gathering has opportunists. Every cause attracts those who see personal gain. That isn’t new. But it is equally true that within those crowds are people with genuine intentions. Students who believe they are standing up for something. Citizens who leave the comfort of their homes because something, to them, feels deeply unfair.
Their sincerity doesn’t disappear because someone else standing beside (or worse- leading them) them has a different motive.Nor does their suffering become acceptable because we disagree with their politics.
This isn’t even about yesterday anymore. It is about us.
About how we’ve trained ourselves to outsource our morality. We don’t evaluate actions anymore; we evaluate teams. If my side does it, there must be a reason. If your side does it, it must be evil. The facts arrive much later, if they arrive at all. When did we become fans instead of citizens?
No leader is right all the time. No activist is right all the time. No political party is right all the time.No ideology has a monopoly over truth.
Human beings are wonderfully inconsistent. We are capable of creating extraordinary ideas and making terrible decisions in the same lifetime. So why do we expect perfection from the people we support? And why do we defend their mistakes as though admitting they were wrong somehow diminishes us?
It doesn’t.
In fact, I would argue the opposite.
The strongest conviction is one that survives disagreement. The healthiest democracy is one where supporters criticise their own side first. The wisest followers are the ones who refuse to become followers at all. Perhaps we have misunderstood loyalty. Loyalty shouldn’t mean defending everything. It should mean wanting something/someone to be better.
Maybe the problem isn’t that we’ve become divided. Maybe the problem is that we’ve forgotten how to divide. To separate ideas from individuals. Policies from parties. Intentions from outcomes. Justice from politics. Compassion from ideology. The day we stop compartmentalising our beliefs is the day we surrender our ability to think.
And the day we surrender our ability to think, someone else will gladly do it for us.
Agree passionately. Disagree fearlessly. But never hand over your entire mind to another human being. No one deserves that privilege.
So past one week for me has been juggling between two weddings of really really close friends, and so the only thing on my mind right now is – no points for guessing – Rabdi! Who cares about the elections, or about the budget – all I can think about right now is the strategy to avoid the line and eat at these functions. (PS – Always start dessert first. Thank me later.)
Just as an after-thought, I would like to question the whole concept of patriotism here. While ‘patriotism’ is generally seen as a uniting emotion, I personally find it rather dividing! If patriotism is one side of a coin, xenophobia is the other. I don’t think we can talk about ‘World Peace’ at various conferences all over the world, while also promoting, encouraging and forcing ‘Patriotism’ at the same time
It is rather inhuman to treat them as unnatural. All of a sudden today, a word that was used as an equivalent to ‘happiness’, cannot be said without a sneer anymore! And even after applying all of the little brains that I have, I cannot come up with one logical explanation to this behavior of ours! Never before have had I understood ‘Live and Let Live’ better.
Hanging her school bag, she was waiting for the rickshaw to come. For her, the day is darker than the night. Every morning is a struggle, to accept something that disgusts her as a norm.
In all its glory this definitely seems to be his moment. But if he wants it to last for another five years after he completes these, I wish to continue Bachi Kankariya’s style of listing A to Z (Read as Zee, because classy, you know) of resolutions, that I hope Modi follows, for the sake of you and me of course. Read on…
HR: Well, what about Salman Khan?
Whoa, 2016 is ending in just two weeks, and it has given us 2016 reasons to be happy that it’s ending. In retrospect, it was a great year, except if you are black, Muslim, transgender, woman, middle class, lower class, animal or a person in the mannequin challenge. While for some the year ended in a jiffy, but for me, it was one long eventful year, with lots of happenings the world would have been better off without.
It is that point in the year when “Just chill” is not a metaphor for relaxing your mind or a shady Salman Khan Song, but you are literally chilling. Ok, maybe this is a very bad one, but what the heck, I am freezing out here! After all, it’s that time of the year when the weather is colder than the Time’s person of the year. Erm..